PRESS RELEASES: MCKOOL SMITH LAUNCHES WHISTLEBLOWER LITIGATION PRACTICE... Login | Register
Currently on Lawdragon

RECENT POSTS
* Another legacy of Enron
* Steps in Wrongful Convictions
* SEC-Citigroup Deal Rejected
* Joe Paterno Turns to J. Sedwick Sollers
* Howrey Bankruptcy Heating Up
* School Data Scrutiny Intensifies
* Supreme Court Preview
* Power Shift To Prosecutors
* Prop. 8 Proponents Likely to Win Standing
* Lawyers Give Big to Obama
* Industry Expects Wave of Claims
* Big Shift in Summer Offers
* Budget Fallouts Continue
* MoloLamken Supreme Court Analysis
* Low Pay Hurts State Judiciaries
* Wal-Mart Decision Hits Firm
* Craig and Skadden in the News
* Boies Expands Out West
* Chancellor Chandler to Step Down
* Cutbacks Lead to Increased Profits
* McCourt Saga’s Latest Twist
Archives

NEWS AND BUSINESS
* Los Angeles Times
* New York Times
* Wall Street Journal
* USA TODAY
* International Herald Tribune
* BusinessWeek
* CNNMoney
* CNBC
* Fortune
* Economist
* New York Post Business
* MSN Money
* Financial Times
* Washington Post
* Variety
* Hollywood Reporter
* WSJ Deal Journal
* WSJ Marketbeat
* Marketplace
* New Yorker
* Inc.com
* Investor's Business Daily

LAW
* Above the Law
* Law.com
* Blog of Legal Times
* Legal Times
* New York Law Journal
* National Law Journal
* Texas Lawyer
* American Lawyer
* Corporate Counsel
* WSJ Law Blog
* Sentencing Law and Policy
* Brian Leiter's Law School Reports

  • The Daily Dragon, by Mark Lacter
  • Another legacy of Enron

    You must remember this: California energy crisis, Enron, power prices, FERC. I suspect a lot of it is pretty hazy at this point - especially on a Friday afternoon in late August - but today came a small bit of vindication for those who have stewed over what was clearly a market manipulation of the power system (too bad it wasn't so clear in 2000 and 2001 when California went through summertime outages). Anyway, a Ninth Circuit panel agreed that the Federal Energy Regulatory System should have considered evidence that Enron had manipulated power prices before denying a refund request. As reported by Legal Pad, the case goes back seven years and the opinion lists 27 different law firms and government agencies that submitted briefs. The decision was by Judge Sidney Thomas and joined by Judges Richard Clifton and M. Margaret McKeown.


    A FERC administrative law judge dismissed the case in 2001 on the grounds that remedies aimed at the California market would cover the rest of the West. Several plaintiffs fought to keep it open, especially after the FERC released Enron documents in 2002 indicating that prices were artificially inflated. The FERC let the evidence in, though it eventually decided not to award further refunds. “FERC did not, however, respond to or take into account the new evidence of Enron’s market manipulation submitted with FERC’s approval,” Thomas wrote. That decision, Thomas said, was arbitrary and capricious. “In determining whether refunds were warranted, FERC should have considered new evidence of intentional market manipulation submitted by the parties with FERC’s approval,” Thomas wrote, before stating that the Ninth Circuit panel was not considering the merits of the claim.



    You might recall that Enron CEO Ken Lay mocked the efforts of California officials by saying, "In the final analysis, it doesn't matter what you crazy people in California do, because I got smart guys who can always figure out how to make money" (sorry to speak ill of the dead, but this guy did lots of damage). Manipulation strategies were known to energy traders under names such as "Fat Boy", "Death Star," "Red Congo," and "Get Shorty". Here's what S. David Freeman, former chair of the California Power Authority, had to say about the Enron role:


    "Enron stood for secrecy and a lack of responsibility. In electric power, we must have openness and companies that are responsible for keeping the lights on. We need to go back to companies that own power plants with clear responsibilities for selling real power under long-term contracts. There is no place for companies like Enron that own the equivalent of an electronic telephone book and game the system to extract an unnecessary middleman’s profits."






<< Back to Blog Home

  

    

  

  

  

  

    

  

    

  

    

  

    

  

    

  

    

Lawdragon Inc.
515 South Flower
Suite 3600
Los Angeles, CA. 90071
800.974.2815 (phone)
Copyright 2005-12 Lawdragon Inc.
Information displayed on Lawdragon is for general informational purposes only, the information is not legal advice and is not an endorsement or recommendation of any law firm, judge, or attorney. Lawdragon does not represent or warrant that the listings, evaluations, or other information found on Lawdragon will be correct, accurate, timely, or otherwise reliable. Do not act upon information found on Lawdragon as a replacement for legal advice provided by a professional attorney in good standing and licensed to practice in your jurisdiction. By visiting Lawdragon.com, you agree to these Terms of Use. Page served in 0.5596 seconds.
ABOUT SSL CERTIFICATES