PRESS RELEASES: MCKOOL SMITH LAUNCHES WHISTLEBLOWER LITIGATION PRACTICE... Login | Register
Currently on Lawdragon

RECENT POSTS
* AG as executioner
* Steps in Wrongful Convictions
* SEC-Citigroup Deal Rejected
* Joe Paterno Turns to J. Sedwick Sollers
* Howrey Bankruptcy Heating Up
* School Data Scrutiny Intensifies
* Supreme Court Preview
* Power Shift To Prosecutors
* Prop. 8 Proponents Likely to Win Standing
* Lawyers Give Big to Obama
* Industry Expects Wave of Claims
* Big Shift in Summer Offers
* Budget Fallouts Continue
* MoloLamken Supreme Court Analysis
* Low Pay Hurts State Judiciaries
* Wal-Mart Decision Hits Firm
* Craig and Skadden in the News
* Boies Expands Out West
* Chancellor Chandler to Step Down
* Cutbacks Lead to Increased Profits
* McCourt Saga’s Latest Twist
Archives

NEWS AND BUSINESS
* Los Angeles Times
* New York Times
* Wall Street Journal
* USA TODAY
* International Herald Tribune
* BusinessWeek
* CNNMoney
* CNBC
* Fortune
* Economist
* New York Post Business
* MSN Money
* Financial Times
* Washington Post
* Variety
* Hollywood Reporter
* WSJ Deal Journal
* WSJ Marketbeat
* Marketplace
* New Yorker
* Inc.com
* Investor's Business Daily

LAW
* Above the Law
* Law.com
* Blog of Legal Times
* Legal Times
* New York Law Journal
* National Law Journal
* Texas Lawyer
* American Lawyer
* Corporate Counsel
* WSJ Law Blog
* Sentencing Law and Policy
* Brian Leiter's Law School Reports

  • The Daily Dragon, by Mark Lacter
  • AG as executioner

    Now here was a scary story: Under a little-noticed provision of last year's reauthorization of the USA Patriot Act, Alberto Gonzales was about to get important new powers in death penalty cases. Specifically, he would have the ability to shorten the time that death row inmates have to appeal convictions to federal courts (that authority had been held by federal judges). Now it's true that the average inmate spends more than 10 years on death row, but it's also true that the use of DNA testing is raising new concerns about the fairness of the death penalty. Gonzales is gone, of course, but the fast-tracking statute is still here, and about to be put into effect. "This is the Bush administration throwing down the gauntlet and saying, 'We are going to speed up executions,' " said Kathryn Kase, a Houston lawyer and co-chair of the death-penalty committee for the National Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers. An NPR story this morning lays out some of the issues, as does a recent LAT story:


    Prosecutors say many death penalty cases take far too long to resolve even when the issue of guilt is clear. Especially in the West, where the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco has blocked many executions, cases can take decades to wind through the courts. In its most recent term, the U.S. Supreme Court restored the death penalty in three cases in which the 9th Circuit had reversed the sentence. One of the cases involved a two-time Arizona murderer who told the sentencing judge: "If you want to give me the death penalty, just bring it right on." He was sentenced in 1990.


    [CUT]

    About 3,350 people are on death row in the U.S., including more than 600 in California. Most were sentenced in state courts, but death cases almost always end up being reviewed by federal judges too. It is impossible to estimate how many inmates might be affected. Some with appeals pending could see their cases shortened. "Cases in the system for 20 years in federal court, it will not affect those," said Cattani. But "it will prevent those from happening in the future." The procedures would cut to six months, instead of a year, the time that death row inmates have to file federal appeals once their cases have been resolved in the state courts. It would also impose strict guidelines on federal judges for deciding such inmates' petitions. Federal district judges would have 450 days, appeals courts 120 days. Proponents say that would prevent foot-dragging by liberal judges.






<< Back to Blog Home

  

    

  

  

  

  

    

  

    

  

    

  

    

  

    

  

    

Lawdragon Inc.
515 South Flower
Suite 3600
Los Angeles, CA. 90071
800.974.2815 (phone)
Copyright 2005-12 Lawdragon Inc.
Information displayed on Lawdragon is for general informational purposes only, the information is not legal advice and is not an endorsement or recommendation of any law firm, judge, or attorney. Lawdragon does not represent or warrant that the listings, evaluations, or other information found on Lawdragon will be correct, accurate, timely, or otherwise reliable. Do not act upon information found on Lawdragon as a replacement for legal advice provided by a professional attorney in good standing and licensed to practice in your jurisdiction. By visiting Lawdragon.com, you agree to these Terms of Use. Page served in 0.5560 seconds.
ABOUT SSL CERTIFICATES