PRESS RELEASES: MCKOOL SMITH LAUNCHES WHISTLEBLOWER LITIGATION PRACTICE... Login | Register
Currently on Lawdragon

RECENT POSTS
* Adultory has its costs
* Steps in Wrongful Convictions
* SEC-Citigroup Deal Rejected
* Joe Paterno Turns to J. Sedwick Sollers
* Howrey Bankruptcy Heating Up
* School Data Scrutiny Intensifies
* Supreme Court Preview
* Power Shift To Prosecutors
* Prop. 8 Proponents Likely to Win Standing
* Lawyers Give Big to Obama
* Industry Expects Wave of Claims
* Big Shift in Summer Offers
* Budget Fallouts Continue
* MoloLamken Supreme Court Analysis
* Low Pay Hurts State Judiciaries
* Wal-Mart Decision Hits Firm
* Craig and Skadden in the News
* Boies Expands Out West
* Chancellor Chandler to Step Down
* Cutbacks Lead to Increased Profits
* McCourt Saga’s Latest Twist
Archives

NEWS AND BUSINESS
* Los Angeles Times
* New York Times
* Wall Street Journal
* USA TODAY
* International Herald Tribune
* BusinessWeek
* CNNMoney
* CNBC
* Fortune
* Economist
* New York Post Business
* MSN Money
* Financial Times
* Washington Post
* Variety
* Hollywood Reporter
* WSJ Deal Journal
* WSJ Marketbeat
* Marketplace
* New Yorker
* Inc.com
* Investor's Business Daily

LAW
* Above the Law
* Law.com
* Blog of Legal Times
* Legal Times
* New York Law Journal
* National Law Journal
* Texas Lawyer
* American Lawyer
* Corporate Counsel
* WSJ Law Blog
* Sentencing Law and Policy
* Brian Leiter's Law School Reports

  • The Daily Dragon, by Mark Lacter
  • Adultory has its costs

    Nah, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia wasn't buying into Jerry Fitch's argument about the high court limiting what a spurned spouse can collect through "alienation of affection." That's otherwise known as stealing another man’s wife, and it's still recognized in seven states (Hawaii, Illinois, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Dakota, Utah and Mississippi where our tale unfolds). Here's the deal: Sandra Fitch had been married to a plumber named Johnny Valentine when she was hired by Fitch's real estate company. Within a year, she and Fitch began an affair. She became pregnant by Fitch and told Valentine that his suspicions about adultery were unfounded. But Valentine had genetic tests done showing he was not the baby's father. He sued for divorce and then he sued Fitch. Valentine won more than $642,000 in compensatory damages. But Fitch says he shouldn't have to pay $112,000 in punitive damages – and he went all the way to the Supremes, asking for a stay of a Mississippi Supreme Court ruling upholding the full verdict. In denying Fitch's application for a stay, Scalia offered no opinion. Here's more from Scotusblog:


    The application stresses that Fitch is not claiming there is “a Constitutional right to adultery,” and that he “is not urging a prohibition on all attempts by the state to foster traditional forms of marital relationships.” It contends that “short term sexual liaisons, lacking the hallmarks of a deep intimate interpersonal component may be subject to state interference justified by less compelling reasons than should be manifest here.” Fitch noted that he married the woman involved, Sandra Day (formerly Sandra Valentine, now Sandra Fitch). While their relationship was “adulterous at the start,” the application says, “there was never any proof adduced that Mr. Fitch had no real affection and love for Sandra during the relationship.”



    By the way, alienation of affection is rooted in the notion of a woman as her husband's property. It goes back to the Teutonic tribes of early Germany in the 10th Century.





<< Back to Blog Home

  

    

  

  

  

  

    

  

    

  

    

  

    

  

    

  

    

Lawdragon Inc.
515 South Flower
Suite 3600
Los Angeles, CA. 90071
800.974.2815 (phone)
Copyright 2005-12 Lawdragon Inc.
Information displayed on Lawdragon is for general informational purposes only, the information is not legal advice and is not an endorsement or recommendation of any law firm, judge, or attorney. Lawdragon does not represent or warrant that the listings, evaluations, or other information found on Lawdragon will be correct, accurate, timely, or otherwise reliable. Do not act upon information found on Lawdragon as a replacement for legal advice provided by a professional attorney in good standing and licensed to practice in your jurisdiction. By visiting Lawdragon.com, you agree to these Terms of Use. Page served in 0.7884 seconds.
ABOUT SSL CERTIFICATES