PRESS RELEASES: MCKOOL SMITH LAUNCHES WHISTLEBLOWER LITIGATION PRACTICE... Login | Register
Currently on Lawdragon

RECENT POSTS
* Another ‘Borat’ lawsuit
* Steps in Wrongful Convictions
* SEC-Citigroup Deal Rejected
* Joe Paterno Turns to J. Sedwick Sollers
* Howrey Bankruptcy Heating Up
* School Data Scrutiny Intensifies
* Supreme Court Preview
* Power Shift To Prosecutors
* Prop. 8 Proponents Likely to Win Standing
* Lawyers Give Big to Obama
* Industry Expects Wave of Claims
* Big Shift in Summer Offers
* Budget Fallouts Continue
* MoloLamken Supreme Court Analysis
* Low Pay Hurts State Judiciaries
* Wal-Mart Decision Hits Firm
* Craig and Skadden in the News
* Boies Expands Out West
* Chancellor Chandler to Step Down
* Cutbacks Lead to Increased Profits
* McCourt Saga’s Latest Twist
Archives

NEWS AND BUSINESS
* Los Angeles Times
* New York Times
* Wall Street Journal
* USA TODAY
* International Herald Tribune
* BusinessWeek
* CNNMoney
* CNBC
* Fortune
* Economist
* New York Post Business
* MSN Money
* Financial Times
* Washington Post
* Variety
* Hollywood Reporter
* WSJ Deal Journal
* WSJ Marketbeat
* Marketplace
* New Yorker
* Inc.com
* Investor's Business Daily

LAW
* Above the Law
* Law.com
* Blog of Legal Times
* Legal Times
* New York Law Journal
* National Law Journal
* Texas Lawyer
* American Lawyer
* Corporate Counsel
* WSJ Law Blog
* Sentencing Law and Policy
* Brian Leiter's Law School Reports

  • The Daily Dragon, by Mark Lacter
  • Another ‘Borat’ lawsuit

    This one comes from the "stars" of the Alabama dinner party scene, who, according to the complaint, were led to believe that the Borat filmmakers had been working on a documentary for Belarus Television. Plaintiff Cindy Streit (she's the one who operated an etiquette training business) asked one of the producers whether Belarus Television was similar to Alabama Public Television and he replied that it was very similar. Apparently reassured, Streit then arranged the dinner party. At that point you might recall things got really weird (as they say, you can’t make this stuff up). From the complaint:


    32. During the dinner later that evening, Defendant [Sacha Baron] Cohen performed numerous offensive and outrageous acts, several of which, identified below, became part of the final, edited version of the Borat movie, its trailers and promotional material.


    33. The scenes in the Borat movie leading up to the dinner include Cohen driving to the house where the dinner is scheduled to take place. At this point, the Borat movie flashes to the following road name: "Secession, Private Drive." the road on which the dinner facility was located does not bear this name, nor do any of the Plaintiffs live or know of such a road. Upon information belief, Defendants scripted the "Secession Drive" scene to set the stage for Cohen's portrayal of Plaintiffs as being racially intolerant.


    34. During the dinner, Cohen referred to Plaintiff Michael Jared as "retarded" and then complimented the other guests on their willingness to let "retarded" persons dine with them.


    35. He asked the dinner guests whether they owned slaves.


    36. He made several derogatory and (sic) sexists remarks to the women who were present.


    37. At one point, Cohen excused himself to the bathroom only to come back to the dinner table holding a plastic bag purportedly containing his own feces...



    If you're looking for a hilarious read – not as funny as the movie, but still pretty good - check out the entire complaint on The Smoking Gun. The lawsuit, which does not specify monetary damages, seeks an injunction barring further use of the embarrassing "dinner scene" from "Borat." As you might know, several other suits have been filed by folks who appeared in the movie and claim they had been duped by the producers. "Borat" has earned over $220 million worldwide on a production budget of $18 million.





<< Back to Blog Home

  

    

  

  

  

  

    

  

    

  

    

  

    

  

    

  

    

Lawdragon Inc.
515 South Flower
Suite 3600
Los Angeles, CA. 90071
800.974.2815 (phone)
Copyright 2005-12 Lawdragon Inc.
Information displayed on Lawdragon is for general informational purposes only, the information is not legal advice and is not an endorsement or recommendation of any law firm, judge, or attorney. Lawdragon does not represent or warrant that the listings, evaluations, or other information found on Lawdragon will be correct, accurate, timely, or otherwise reliable. Do not act upon information found on Lawdragon as a replacement for legal advice provided by a professional attorney in good standing and licensed to practice in your jurisdiction. By visiting Lawdragon.com, you agree to these Terms of Use. Page served in 0.5768 seconds.
ABOUT SSL CERTIFICATES