PRESS RELEASES: MCKOOL SMITH LAUNCHES WHISTLEBLOWER LITIGATION PRACTICE... Login | Register
Currently on Lawdragon

RECENT POSTS
* $10 million to do what?
* Steps in Wrongful Convictions
* SEC-Citigroup Deal Rejected
* Joe Paterno Turns to J. Sedwick Sollers
* Howrey Bankruptcy Heating Up
* School Data Scrutiny Intensifies
* Supreme Court Preview
* Power Shift To Prosecutors
* Prop. 8 Proponents Likely to Win Standing
* Lawyers Give Big to Obama
* Industry Expects Wave of Claims
* Big Shift in Summer Offers
* Budget Fallouts Continue
* MoloLamken Supreme Court Analysis
* Low Pay Hurts State Judiciaries
* Wal-Mart Decision Hits Firm
* Craig and Skadden in the News
* Boies Expands Out West
* Chancellor Chandler to Step Down
* Cutbacks Lead to Increased Profits
* McCourt Saga’s Latest Twist
Archives

NEWS AND BUSINESS
* Los Angeles Times
* New York Times
* Wall Street Journal
* USA TODAY
* International Herald Tribune
* BusinessWeek
* CNNMoney
* CNBC
* Fortune
* Economist
* New York Post Business
* MSN Money
* Financial Times
* Washington Post
* Variety
* Hollywood Reporter
* WSJ Deal Journal
* WSJ Marketbeat
* Marketplace
* New Yorker
* Inc.com
* Investor's Business Daily

LAW
* Above the Law
* Law.com
* Blog of Legal Times
* Legal Times
* New York Law Journal
* National Law Journal
* Texas Lawyer
* American Lawyer
* Corporate Counsel
* WSJ Law Blog
* Sentencing Law and Policy
* Brian Leiter's Law School Reports

  • The Daily Dragon, by Mark Lacter
  • $10 million to do what?

    That's what members of the Bancroft family would like to know. You remember the Bancrofts - former owners of DJ and the WSJ who sold their company to Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. As part of the deal, News Corp. gave the family $30 million to cover its various fees, but the final bill wound up being $3 million higher. At issue in particular is a $10 million bill from Martin Lipton at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, a firm that doesn't break out hourly charges because, well, they just don't do it that way. Wachtell, Lipton just submits an invoice for “services rendered” (wouldn't you love to get away with that!). Here's more from Deal Journal:


    Some family members argue that Wachtell doesn’t deserve the $10 million. As they see it, Lipton and his firm acted as little more than emissaries between the family and News Corp. These family members zero in on the fact that News corp.’s unsolicited $60-a-share, submitted in April, didn’t improve by the time the deal was sealed on Aug. 1. Some family members were so dissatisfied with Wachtell’s counsel that they hired their own personal lawyers.



    Oh, the Bancrofts are also balking at paying $18.5 million to Merrill Lynch, which was brought on to push for a higher price that never happened.





<< Back to Blog Home

  

    

  

  

  

  

    

  

    

  

    

  

    

  

    

  

    

Lawdragon Inc.
515 South Flower
Suite 3600
Los Angeles, CA. 90071
800.974.2815 (phone)
Copyright 2005-12 Lawdragon Inc.
Information displayed on Lawdragon is for general informational purposes only, the information is not legal advice and is not an endorsement or recommendation of any law firm, judge, or attorney. Lawdragon does not represent or warrant that the listings, evaluations, or other information found on Lawdragon will be correct, accurate, timely, or otherwise reliable. Do not act upon information found on Lawdragon as a replacement for legal advice provided by a professional attorney in good standing and licensed to practice in your jurisdiction. By visiting Lawdragon.com, you agree to these Terms of Use. Page served in 0.5931 seconds.
ABOUT SSL CERTIFICATES