EDITORIAL REVIEW
This securities defense giant nearly got Indymac off the hook on securities
claims and is among the few lawyers in the U.S. who has successfully
defended a securities class action trial.
—2008 Lawdragon 500 Leading Lawyers in America
This standout securities litigator specializes in striking out plaintiffs who sue high-tech, banking and health care businesses.
— Lawdragon,
January 2008
One of California’s leading securities litigators, Daniel Tyukody in 2005 won on behalf of Thane International Inc. one of the rare securities class actions to go to trial and final verdict, a case which was all the more unusual because it involved strict liability '33 Act claims. A partner in Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe’s Los Angeles office, Tyukody most recently defended Insight Enterprises, an information technology computer products company, against shareholder claims. He represents issuers, underwriters and individuals in private securities cases, SEC and SRO proceedings, and in conducting internal investigations for boards and audit committees. He is currently representing advertising company L90 Inc. in an important Ninth Circuit appeal concerning the scope of aiding and abetting versus primary liability for purposes of Rule 10b-5.
— Lawdragon,
March 2006
Submit your evaluation of this attorney.
Contact Lawdragon about the information in this review.
Daniel Tyukody, a partner in the Los Angeles office, is a member of the Securities Litigation Group. Mr. Tyukody's practice
focuses on defending underwriters, issuers and individual officers and directors in securities class actions, derivative
cases, "M&A" cases and SEC proceedings. Mr. Tyukody has also represented the audit committees or special committees of
Fortune 500 companies conducting special investigations.
Mr. Tyukody has been named as one of the "Top 500 Lawyers In America" by Lawdragon magazine (2007) and one of the "Top 500 Litigators In America" (2006). Mr. Tyukody
was also named as one of the "Top Securities Litigators in California" by the Daily Journal. He was lead trial counsel and
obtained a complete defense verdict in June 2005 in Miller v. Thane, one of only seven securities class action
lawsuits tried to verdict since 1995. This case was named one of the "Top Ten Defense
Verdicts" in California by the Daily Journal.
Mr. Tyukody has successfully argued several matters of first impression under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. Mr. Tyukody also provides securities counseling and advice to numerous companies and companies considering or
intending to go public.
Before joining the firm, Mr. Tyukody was a partner at Clifford Chance and a partner at Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison.
Related Practice Areas
Admitted in
Memberships
Honors
- "100 Lawyers You Need to Know in Securities Litigation," Lawdragon Magazine, April 2008
- Top 500 Lawyers In America
- Top 500 Litigators In America
- Top Securities Lawyers In California
- Associate Editor, University of Chicago Law Review
Education
See Library Tab for articles, publications and presentations
by Daniel Tyukody
Lawdragon News
Publications
- "The Next Wave of Securities Litigation: FIN 48," Law 360 (November 18, 2008)
- "'Stoneridge' Alters Legal Landscape," The National Law Journal (March 17, 2008)
- "Scope of Primary Liability," The National Law Journal (August 27, 2007)
- "Court Confusion: Recent rulings have failed to resolve the divide among U.S. courts applying the Central Bank ruling," International Financial Law Review (October 2006)
- "Talking to the Street: Dealing with Securities Analysts," UCLA Directors Training Program
(1999-2002)
- "High-tech Times and Globalization," Corporate Board Member (1999)
- "Expert Discovery Under the Federal Rules and the California Code of Civil Procedure," The State of the Art Trial, Association of Business Trial Lawyers Good Faith Inquiries Under the Bankruptcy Code, 52 University of Chicago Law Review 795 (1985)
Speeches & Programs
Mr. Tyukody has lectured on securities law topics in various forums. He is a frequent speaker on topics ranging from talking with Wall Street, to protecting companies from shareholder class actions, and the ramifications of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.