Michael Louis Kelly
MICHAEL LOUIS KELLY is recognized as one of the top trial attorneys in the United States. He has been selected by prestigious peer groups as one of the Leading 500 Plaintiff Lawyers in the United States, and is voted a Southern California Super Lawyer year after year. He is AV Rated, the highest rating by members of the bar and judiciary for both legal ability and ethical standards. His numerous record-setting jury verdicts have dramatically expanded consumer protection and safeguards.
Mr. Kelly’s trial and settlement results, individually, and as a lead member of multiple nation-wide mass litigations, have resulted in the recovery of hundreds of millions of dollars for his clients.
Mr. Kelly is a senior partner in the law firm of Kirtland & Packard LLP and utilizes a team of talented lawyers whose varying backgrounds, training and experience combine to create a formidable litigation team. The word most used to describe his commitment to his clients’ cases is “relentless.”
Mr. Kelly accepts only a limited number of cases, and gives each the highest level of personal attention. To see if your claim is one he might assist you with, please fill out this inquiry form or call him at 310-536-1000.
- Seattle University (B.A., 1975);
- University of Idaho (J.D., 1978)
Member, Idaho Law Review, 1976-1977;
Board of Editors, 1977-1978; Comments Editor, 1977-1978
- Admitted to California Bar, 1978
- Admitted to California Supreme Court, 1978
- Admitted to Colorado Bar, 1987
- Admitted to U.S. Supreme Court, 1987
- Admitted to U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, 1981
- Admitted to U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California, 1980
- Admitted to U.S. Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, 1987
- Member, State Bar of California
- Member, State Bar of Colorado
- Member, American Bar Association
Vice Chairperson, Committee on Aviation Litigation, 1990-1992
Member, Section of Tort and Insurance Practice
Member, Section of Science and Technology
- Member, Los Angeles County Bar Association
- Member, South Bay Bar Association
- Member, Lawyer-Pilot’s Bar Association
- Member, Association of Trial Lawyers of America
- Member, Consumer Attorneys of California
- Member, Los Angeles County Superior Court Settlement Programs
- Member, Association of Business Trial Lawyers
Representative Verdicts & Settlements
$1,600,000,000 Settlement before trial – Class action
In re Toyota Motor Corp, Unintended Acceleration Cases
Kelly was selected by Judge James V. Selna to serve as one of the 5 members of the Economic Loss Lead Counsel Committee, which assisted Co-Lead Counsel in obtaining the record-setting settlement in the Toyota Unintended Acceleration Class Action. The settlement received final approval from Judge Selna on July 19, 2013.
$63,900,000 Jury verdict after 25 days of trial – Fraud and conspiracy claim
Baker v. PrivatAir
Kelly represented the chief pilot for Bruce Willis and Demi Moore’s Gulfstream GII jet. Captain Baker was fired after the flight crew conspired to set him up to be terminated for bogus safety violations, because the flight crew thought that Captain Baker was too frugal when arranging for flight crew accommodations when they traveled with Willis or Moore. Kelly proved that the flight crew engaged in a conspiracy and made false allegations about Captain Baker to both Willis and Moore and to the FAA. This verdict was recognized as one of the top ten verdicts in the United States for 2005.
$19,600,000 Total of 1,300 individual settlements – Mass action for fraud and misrepresentation
1,300 Trade School Graduates v. Confidential Defendants
Kelly represented over 1,300 trade school graduates who claimed the trade school defendants misrepresented the jobs which students could potentially be qualified for and hired into after graduating from defendants’ trade school, and the compensation that would be available to them. The graduates claimed that they took out substantial student loans based on these pervasive misrepresentations, and were not only unable to find the represented employment opportunities, but could not service their loans with the actual low level job opportunities actually available to them after graduation.
$18,500,000 Settlement after 35 days of trial – Intentional business interference claim
Kelly represented an energy entrepreneur who arranged to work with a foreign state-owned energy company, to help them purchase a large California oil company. The entrepreneur retained defendants to act as investment bankers in the transaction. Kelly presented evidence to the jury that defendants then cut the entrepreneur and his principal out of the deal and steered the purchase of the oil company to another client. Defendants settled the case hours before the case was to be given to the jury.
$12,200,000 Settlement before trial – Class action
Opperman v. Verizon
Kelly brought this class action claim against Verizon, based on the promotion and sale of the Motorola V710 cell phone. Motorola manufactured and promoted the V710 as a “state of the art” phone, capable of amazing feats with the new Bluetooth® technology. Verizon was the first carrier to offer the phone, and also touted the benefits of Bluetooth® technology. However, when Verizon sold the phone, it had Motorola disable most of the Bluetooth® technology, so that it could make its customers pay to use its own “Get it Now” service to perform the same function that Bluetooth® would have. Kelly was successful convincing Verizon to buy back all of the Motorola V710 phones from customers, along with any accessories, and to compensate them for the loss of phone function.
$12,047,508 Settlement before trial – Class action
Seibel v. Ralphs
Kelly represented approximately 353,000 consumers who took part in a promotion at Ralphs, whereby shoppers were promised a free three day, two night stay at a “Marriott-like” hotel throughout the U.S., in return for purchasing $400 worth of groceries in a 4 week period. Although 353,000 shoppers purchased the groceries, the company that Ralphs hired to provide the hotel rooms absconded with the money Ralphs had provided to pay for the rooms. Ralphs then advised the shoppers that they had “filled out the forms wrong” and refused to provide the rooms. Kelly was successful in obtaining the rooms, or if the customers preferred, a Mastercard gift card for the value of the rooms.
$10,000,000 Settlement before trial – Class action
Rubio v. Capital One
Kelly brought this class action claim against Capital One, based on a promotion by Capital One for a credit card promising a “fixed rate” of 6.99% APR. Several years after Kelly’s client agreed to obtain the card and transfer other card balances to it, Capital One raised her rate to 15.9% APR, claiming that “fixed” meant “not tied to an index”, not fixed as in “not subject to change for the life of the card.”
$7,000,000 Settlement before trial – Injured minor in juvenile detention
“Minor A” v. Los Angeles County
“Minor A” was attacked and beaten by other incarcerated minors for refusing to use his “trustee” status to help gangs run drugs between the detention blocks. His injuries were severe and left him paralyzed. Kelly proved that “Minor A’s” civil right to protection while incarcerated had been violated, and that the juvenile facility had created a dangerous condition by, among other things, knowingly allowing chronic understaffing, improper treatment of minors suffering from mental conditions, and allowing surveillance cameras to be disabled.
$6,000,000 Settlement on eve of trial – Roadway design case
Meyers v. Amador County and Caltrans
Plaintiff was rendered paraplegic when the vehicle in which he was a passenger went over a 27 foot high cliff dug out by State of California beneath a sharp curve in a County road. The accident vehicle was exceeding the “advisory” speed posted for that section of the County road. Kelly presented evidence that: 1) the “advisory” speed sign was posted in the wrong place (too far before the dangerous curve) and that the section of the road preceding the accident curve was constructed in such a fashion that drivers were led to disregard the advisory speed sign and were actually increasing their speed after the advisory speed sign, not lowering it; and 2) that the County and/or State of California should have constructed a guard rail, or taken other protective measures to prevent vehicles going off the accident cliff. Through an intense investigative campaign, Kelly discovered a substantial accident history at the sharp curve, which had been denied by defendants, and he alleged that documents evidencing this accident history had been wrongfully destroyed.
$4,344,000 Settlement on first day of trial – SUV design defect case
Plaintiff was injured when a rented SUV rolled backward over him, crushing his legs. Kelly proved that the design of the SUV was such that it could move when it should not.
$2,600,000 Verdict – Insurance bad faith claim
Indochina International v. Stratford Insurance Company
Kelly proved at trial that Stratford Insurance Company had acted in bad faith when it denied a claim by plaintiff to defend his company from claims arising from a trucking accident involving one of his delivery trucks. Plaintiff, who had escaped the Cambodian “Killing Fields” and built his Asian food distribution business from $5 he borrowed from a relative, came close to losing his business.
$2,300,000 Settlement before trial – Commercial products claim
Kelly proved that metals provided to a manufacturer were improperly smelted, causing the products to crack and fail when utilized.
$2,020,495 Jury Verdict at 12 days of trial – Dangerous Condition of Public Property – State of California
Patch v. State of California (Caltrans)
Kelly represented an elderly couple who was forced off the I-80 Freeway by another driver, and crashed into a huge tree located only 19.5 feet from the freeway. The Highway Design Manual required that there be a 30ft “Clear Recovery Zone” beside the freeway, to give vehicles forced off the roadway a chance to recover or to reduce the chance of them impacting a fixed object. Kelly presented evidence that convinced the jury that the tree should have been removed as part of a freeway repaving project, and that it was a “dangerous condition” as defined by the Government Code, entitling his clients to a verdict in their favor.
$2,000,000 Settlement before trial – Class action
Hogan v. USP Labs
Kelly brought this class action claim against USP Labs alleging that their pre-workout supplements Jack3d and OxyELITE did not provide adequate warnings that they contained Dimethylamylamine (“DMAA”), which if not used under strict dosing guidelines could potentially cause serious health problems. A settlement was reached providing for more descriptive and prominent product warnings, and a common fund of $2,000,000 to provide refunds to consumers and a contribution to the Consumer Federation of America, which works to promote health and safety issues related to food and consumer products.
$1,600,000 Settlement before trial – Aviation crash
Continental v. Huffman Aviation
Kelly proved that the aircraft maintenance facility had improperly overhauled an aircraft engine, causing the aircraft to crash short of the runway, causing injury to a passenger.
$1,200,000 Settlement before trial – Sexual assault by a celebrity
Kelly’s client was on vacation with her husband in Hawaii, where she met the defendant and his wife poolside. Plaintiff’s husband went to play golf. Defendant was mixing his own drinks at the pool, and became quite intoxicated. When plaintiff left to return to her room, defendant followed her back to her floor of the hotel, pulled her into the alcove holding the ice machine, and attempted to rape her. She managed to knee defendant in the groin, and escape down the hall to her room.
$1,100,000 Settlement before trial – Breast reconstruction insurance claim
Plaintiff had a breast removed because of cancer, and her insuror refused to pay for her reconstructive surgery, calling it “elective-cosmetic.” Kelly was successful in obtaining reimbursement for the surgery, and substantial damages for the emotional distress plaintiff endured.
$1,000,000 Settlement at the start of trial – Falling death of child claim
Bae v. Berendo Properties
Plaintiffs’ 20 month old daughter fell to her death, through a low apartment window, which had no window guards, and a defectively affixed window screen. Kelly proved that the landlord should have anticipated that the window should have had guards or other protections, before they rented the apartment to a family with two small children.
$1,000,000 Settlement before trial- Failure to Obtain Informed Consent
Plaintiffs (Mother, Father and Minor Child) brought suit against OBGYN and Hospital for failure to properly inform them that Mother had tested positive for Cystic Fibrosis, after previous pregnancy resulted in miscarriage. Parents went on to conceive again resulting in birth of Minor Child inflicted with Cystic Fibrosis, and thus were deprived of the opportunity to explore Selective In Vetro Fertilization as an option.
See Library Tab for articles, publications and presentations by Michael Lewis Kelly